I agree with it being a collector piece and it being better as one.
[ATTACH] This is the most accurate image I've taken of it.
Really? Got it for $65 lmao.
Or some coins at least.
No, I've seen much better in PCGS 67. And another that would for sure be 67 got 65. I feel they inaccuratly grade coins.
Hi. It isnt really an accurate representation. I did not want to sway your opinions with the good angles so I three in the worst angle I could...
I did not know that about CAC collector memberships! Thats awesome. I will email and try to get that. I have a toned wheat that may get a green. I...
Alright I will do that.
Im arlight with that.
ANACS gave my quarter similar which was at least 67 and gave it 64:( They undergrade washingtons.
Yeah Im just getting the reg silver one every time.
So you dont think it will get a CAC? My dad and I really just want to try it, I am a young numismatist and my dad said he'd pay half of the cost...
I agree but honestly its worth a shot. Not much of a hassle for me tbh
I am sure the blue and orange is toning.
But remember, there are always new finds.
64+ with me.
Hi, it looks as if your coin was cleaned a long time ago (when people did it for fun) and there is some residual toning left from after. The lines...
I think I cant join, I think you have to sub through a dealer now?
[ATTACH]
As you can see, there are some marks on the coin (and the holder) but much better than most 64s and 65 CACs[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
