I think I see what you're getting at. These images will help. [IMG] [IMG]
That is a good point actually
I believe that is within the mint tolerance if it is indeed 27*.
Due to a change in the die creation process, coins older than 1989 can not bear a repunched mintmark. Hope this helps!
Most definitely the black background. The white seems to appear washed out while the black provides nice contrast IMO.
Lg. date
Looks to me like a normal 1988 reverse on the last two. The first is hard to tell. Basically if the part of the G that's supposed to be "boldened"...
Theyre definetely special!
Most definetely is cool! For $0.25 the learning experience is totally worth it. I got a lot of other interesting foreigns with this. Including...
Funny. That’s pretty awesome though, must’ve been really cool to see them all together. It’s funny, I know what you mean by that copper smell,...
Very nice
Interesting...
Thanks everyone. I was clearly wrong on the date! I'll get the diameter when I get home. I did get it out of a junk bin for 25c. Plus, I'm not...
Hey guys. I found this coin today that I got at the Denver Coin Show back in May. Still dont know exactly what it is! I think the date is 1870,...
I mean the die crack! The die crack can reach from the rim to anywhere on the bust ;)
Yeah I agree with the overpriced coins, no need to have too many of them.
Also, it would be the only spiked head listed of a denomination higher than 25 cents.
You could get that listed on Cuds on Coins as a spiked head!
It is true that if the US mint does make one it will probably be heavily overpriced, but I wouldn't mind seeing a high-relief DCAM proof version...
And niquelar means to nickel-plate!
Separate names with a comma.
