Just circulation wear and tear with a little bit of damage thrown in for fun. Not a mint error of any type.
Due to the cleaning it has received in the past it’s a details, genuine coin. What a shame.
PS- On coins it’s not front and back, it’s obverse and reverse. :)
If I’m correct the 1968-S Nickels we’re only issued in Proof. Yours looks to be an Impaired Proof, meaning it has in some way been handled...
Welcome to CT. Follow Randy’s advice.
All depends on the type of coin, date and mint mark, condition and if it’s graded or not. I would expect to pay around $300 for a raw common date,...
What’s a wreath without gold? Lol [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It’s a Beatles token, the Fab Four that’s dated 1964. They have a wreath on both sides of the token. :) [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Seated Liberty’s-all Half Dimes. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Worn and a little beat up but they are tough dates to find. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Great find! Clamshell errors are on the difficult side to find. Congratulations
Not even close.
Definitely a nicer common date.
A couple of them may be nice enough that grading would be beneficial but breaking up that nice of a set would be difficult to do. I’d think about...
Very nice set of Caesar’s.
That 1952-D is a great lamination. It looks as if you could insert a small piece of paper under the error and it looks like a small piece broke...
Looks good to me as well. I think the wear patterns are correct for a genuine coin. The CC mint mark also looks like a VAM and a counterfeiter...
It’s a proof coin so leave as in. It’s a very minor error and the packaging is necessary to show it’s an error.
I’ll stick with the current scale. I’m too old to change. :)
I don’t collect commemorative coins but my 7070 album needed a few. Here’s what I have in the Dansco. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
Separate names with a comma.
