Honestly, for a low grade circulated 1916 SLQ, authentication is much more important than grade and both TPG's have very similar standards in this...
This war is already in progress! Read more: http://www.cointalk.com/t206022/#ixzz1vYipLrAk Have fun, it will be a book pretty soon.
I am so scared to ask, but what is a Teletubby dome?
LOL, got more than you bargained for huh? FWIW, I think we both tried to warn you! The second I saw this thread, my immediate reaction was "Oh...
I feel like I am in the twilight zone. Every thread leads back to the same place. Read more: http://www.cointalk.com/t206389-4/#ixzz1vY090Ll3
They are only 90% repeatable because of the inherent subjectivity in grading. Have you never looked at a coin an thought, I could grade that...
It isn't written anywhere. But if you are going to make ridiculous claims and not back them up, don't get mad at me when I accuse you of blowing...
I saw absolutely nothing in that post about premium gem SLQ's. Just more worthless drivel. Over the years I have endured your boorish BOLD...
I have news for you, the auction prices realized before the TPG's would be useless anyway. The TPG's have been around for 25 years, I wouldn't...
And it really doesn't because the standards for a 1929 vs 1928-S are very different with regards to strike. Here is a 1928-S SLQ PCGS MS66 FH CAC...
That is not an apt analogy Chris, and you know it! Wow, this is exactly the mentality that I was talking about earlier. I don't care how long...
I prefer [ATTACH]
The missing silver proofs reside in PCGS PR70 DCAM slabs. [IMG] Oh yeah, I like the flags. My father used to collect flags. [IMG]...
I feel the need to make one more point. Just because the membership might be less knowledgeable doesn't mean that Cointalk is an inferior forum....
If you have experience collecting premium gem SLQ's, then prove it. And why do you find it necessary to compose your posts in a forum chat...
If you were a member of either of those forums you would understand why I think the members of those forums are more knowledgeable collectors....
I am not trying to win, just offering a dissenting opinion to your own. And as an aspiring coin cataloger, I would characterize it as a "speckeld...
The PCGS standard for MS66 Eye Appeal is: And while you find this coin horribly ugly, I think your opinion is in the minority. Even if the...
Please don't phrase it that way. A CAC sticker does not mean the coin has above average eye appeal and does not equate to attractiveness. It...
You can't compare strikes across different dates/mm. The 1929 had an above average strike while the 1928-S had a below average strike. Almost...
Separate names with a comma.
