That one's a wild card. Norway or 1964 OR 1814!
Always loved that type.
Sorry, but this one falls afoul of the terms of the OP: (Bold emphases from the original.) Believe me, I've been tempted to break the rule...
Is that Livia at top left?
If it makes you feel any better, I no longer own that coin, so as with much of this stuff, I'm only showing off "bygones". ;) Some of my bygones...
I think you're talking about another issue. The point is, a coin WITHOUT wear CAN have been circulated. Circulation does not automatically equal...
United States: proof copper-nickel 3-cent piece, Liberty head type, 1888 [IMG] [IMG]
[IMG] [IMG]
Gee... ya think so? LOL Stork gets the "Mistress of Understatement" title for the day. Sweet original looking 1833 CBH for ... junk silver?...
Yes. This is why the old, confusing term "Uncirculated" is something of a misnomer, and used less often now, having been replaced by the term...
Here is a lot of 32 German Imperial (Kaiserreich) minor-denomination coins; 1- 2- and 5-pfennig pieces from the late 1800s. All are in 2x2...
[IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
Very choice AU, I'd say, from the details. To me it does look like a slider. I'd really want to get this under a loupe and see the light play...
Yep, sorry. Environmental damage.
Which is exactly what I did by being the first to respond to a grading thread about a coin from a series which is one of my weaker ones! LOL :p
Must've been, 'cause it's been nuked now. Listing removed.
Nice. The SLQ is well worn, sure, but decent rims and full date, so better than most of the circs out there, and it looks like a wholesome grey...
I'll climb on the back of @Paddy54's parade float. I see I was initially too low but still just don't see a Mint State coin here. Nice, sure....
Hm. Really? See, I told you franklin halves aren't my strong suit.
Separate names with a comma.
