Check for the C reverse. Nice coin. I assume it was in there because the 64-D is very common and got sold for bullion. [ATTACH]
There was a price quoted here in a different thread. Try the search. Although this coin has some condition issues.
Well from the photo those lines look more like cleaning scratches than wood grain from improper alloy mix. But I don't have the coin in hand. It's...
I like the coins. But I am going to guess that 1952-S dime is not MS-70.
That appears to be from a harsh scrubbing.
Top one is the Web Note. Bottom one is regular. [ATTACH]
It's not double headed. Whatever. Post 10 shows 2 photos of the same obverse. Post 12 shows the reverse. I enjoyed your rant though.
They are locking up all my spots. :( [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Lincoln has been on about a trillion cents. So if it's not him, it's going to have to really be something extraordinary. (Less than 100M Pres...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_notes
I doubt that coin is genuine. The date is wrong. The 7 and 9 are off. The leaf above the date is wrong. The color is pretty much impossible.[ATTACH]
Plating would not increase the weight by 2 grams. There is a suspicious seam on one of the edges. Even if this was an off metal, if the size was...
It's supposed to weigh 9.4.
So they prefer under graded coins? With the over graded coins you can put them on "sale" and the customer may feel he is getting a deal. In this...
Wrong metal would be significant. Maybe it was plated or coated.
If they are gold colored, they may have been plated which reduces the value.
Would the third print be lined up correctly, if the cut was correct?
Well, but I'm not going to spend them. They are worth minus 7 cents.
While the footprint is an iconic symbol, for a coin design it's lazy.
I think the test was that it cost $14.
Separate names with a comma.
