Here was that other coin: [ATTACH] Vs [ATTACH] It graded MS 65 CAC and the GC photos were much closer. I had the coin in-hand and I could see...
That is why I mentioned the TruView. I had a very similar case recently. The TruView picture had no hits while the GC picture was similar to this...
Does this count as one? I briefly owned this one. I thought the design was great but the eye appeal of this particular example wasn’t up to my...
MS 64
Maybe they thought it was “only” worth 65+ money but the “market” didn’t read the “market grading” and bid it up to what an accurately graded 65+...
I’m seeing this as being one of those on the borderline...either AU 58 or MS 63/64. Either way I like the look and think you got a good deal since...
Anyone want to post a new toner or are we ending the run after a solid 273 pages? :)
I still think it's a bit severe here. Anywhere from 1.5 points to 3 points is a bit too much in my opinion. If everything was graded that way...
I still believe it would be worth $1k-$1.5k in its proper MS 64 holder. The MS 65+ grade was what pushed it to $3.5k, which is beyond gem money...
I also thought the colors were great (although I felt the reverse was neutral/slightly negative). But to me this is "Market" grading to the max....
And the answer is.... MS 65+ CAC [ATTACH]
Nice to see you back @ron_c :)
Reveal later tonight...get your guesses in...
Mechanical error :p
I’ll guess 66FS. Like @jtlee321 , I’m not sure if the reverse marks are as struck or not. They are a bit distracting in my opinion, but I’ve never...
Please guess. :) [ATTACH]
Now, tell us all now! :D
MS 64 PL MS 65 (small white Anacs holder is my guess on this one)
AU 55 Lovely circulated toner!
Agreed @BooksB4Coins ; it might be a lost cause :facepalm: Plus if one takes a look at that website, they haven't listed anything for sale since...
Separate names with a comma.
