Some would go cameo. There is a little something that troubles me, though. Some of the photos show fields that are so black and featureless that...
63
Sort of need to know how they're priced, too. None of them is so scarce that you won't be able to pass and find another fairly soon. Look at...
63ish. No FB.
It's really hard to generalize on how much coins have increased or decreased. In the U.S., the coins that have increased consistently are the...
[IMG]
Pay what you would for a coin ignoring the variety. The value depends on the grade of the coin. They are available in high grade, so if you're...
The 1887 VAM 12 is a rather common variety. You should be able to buy it for little to no premium. Here's a link to it on VAMWorld....
No.
Probably 1887 VAM 12, also known as "Alligator Eye." It's simply a catchy, and memorable, name for this variety, which has strong doubling on the...
62 or 63. The reverse may look tons better than the obverse, but that's fairly typical, and the obverse has a lot of light marks to go along with...
Type Unc. SLQs are more expensive than type Mercury dimes or Walking Lib. halves because SLQs weren't made in the 1940s.
Mainly a U.S. collector, but I am taking a shining to the pre-1790 British stuff. This just came today. [IMG]
Yes, I use f8-ish for most of my shots. Where the faster f2.8 lens comes in handy is when focusing. Twice the light comes through the viewfinder...
Looks like they're reversed photographs of coins posted on April 1. Oh, and the date was not part of the seated half hub.
Yes. My 105 is an f4 lens.
For tethering a Nikon, I use ControlMyNikon, which is not sold by Nikon. It's about $20-30 and works really well. The D80 body is about 8 years...
Chris, I'll hijack this thread, now that the question about the original coin has been answered, and confuse the issue you bring up a little with...
I've got a flip-over double strike of one of those.
Looks like all corrosion. I don't see the pinched rim you get with encased cents. I also don't think there are encased cents much newer than the...
Separate names with a comma.