I need to forward some payment info to the SSDC welcoming committee. Sometime this week, depending on when I pick up a certain coin in the mail...
I'm going to remember this one. I'm sure it'll come up handy in the future.
It looks much better now. The spots are most likely a result of the previous dip that wasn't rinsed well. Fortunately, they're not in the worst...
Almost always. I bought an posted one a month or so ago that looks like a 21-P until you see the mint mark.
That's going to need a quick dip and a proper rinse to fix the improper rinse after the last dip it had. Quite lustrous, horrible detail from...
:D That is funny! I'll have to remember that one.
Obverse doesn't particularly look like it's been cleaned.
I see the S tilted right, but no S/S. Seems to match VAM 5.
For the record, that's not me. I do agree, however, that both the 1928 Lincoln and the 1901 Indian cent have been cleaned and have retoned. The...
Because they make you think of pancakes, and everyone loves pancakes!
If the OP (Kevin Wu) is Chinese, he might disagree with that.
Congrats! Again, I don't know what this is worth to error collectors, but there are error specialists here who might be able to give a good estimate.
[IMG]
[IMG] (Is it bad form to use the same GIF twice in one day to comment?)
I don't see anything wrong with the slab or coin. Is it a Rev. of '78? Database glitches like this happen all the time. The serial number is...
Pros: - You can see the coin better. - Future buyers can see the coin better. - Future buyers won't discount the coin by the amount it'll take...
40 frames! Looks nice. The coloring seems to have survived quantization, although I don't have the coin in hand, so only you'll be able to tell...
Nice. A reholder is definitely in order with this coin, though.
Attractive coin, but nobody is going to be able to tell the difference between a PR66 and a PR69 from pictures, especially those. Bear in mind...
Separate names with a comma.
