What he said!
Exactly right, coincidentally, this is the same explanation for elevation chromatics where the recesses of the devices of a coin will have a...
That would support Jason's guess that the coin may be prooflike as an EDS coin. I have several modern Jefferson's with prooflike surfaces and...
Thanks for posting the image URLs, and we are all just "internet experts." I don't recall anyone saying you are always wrong, in fact, you are...
The devices and lettering of the coin provide a measure of protection to the areas that are adjacent to them. The toning on this coin was...
What is the grade on the 41-D? And is it also in ICG plastic?
I think the proof Franklin is NT/MA
The gouges at the top left of the obverse and on the rim should prevent a gem grade, MS64.
I'm leaning AT on this one, though the reverse and far left of the obverse look fine.
1983-D: I like my 83-D, it has great color. [img]
My initial impression was MS63, but based on the new photos that show much better luster, I would say MS64. I don't see any way for this coin to...
1982-D: [img]
I want you to contribute, but please limit it to coins that you think are AT.
Quintessential tab toning: NT I do have to ask, @BlackberryPie, do you realize the point of this thread is to post coins that you think are AT...
NT
I would like this in MS63, but I think it graded MS64.
Cameo coins from early proof sets are very rare, I’m not sure I would call them conditional rarities. I haven’t checked recently but I would...
Nice looking coin, I don't see anything that would lend me to say AT but with proof coins, you really need to see the coin in hand to render a...
Whenever someone pays outrageous money for a Kennedy Half, Jefferson Nickel, Roosevelt Dime etc., all we hear is how crazy it is for someone to...
Separate names with a comma.
