A short set (1941 - 1947) can be put together rather affordably. I'm currently working on one in MS.
Better look at your red book, Cheech! :wacky:
If we are talking modern coins, then I agree mostly. There have been a few modern coins that I liked the look of and added to my collection. When...
Star on the 86 and no star on the 84.
Left to right CoinTalk user names, please! I recognize a few of the faces from previous posts but would be nice to have here for history.
Been quite a spell for me ordering direct from the mint as well, probably around this same time.
I'd buy those all day long at that price. You did good, Gunney.
Hmmm, I wasn't even aware of this. Just logged back into my registry and blew the dust off it. At least they did not delete all the PCGS coins...
MS64PL
MS64 and a dandy at that!
It's not in the cards this year, but my wife and I keep talking about next year!
A modern commem that I rather like from my collection: [ATTACH]
I put MS64+. A really nice coin but, I feel, it's another one that didn't quite pass muster to the gem grade.
I don't see anything out of the ordinary. Regular circulation wear.
62? Nope, don't agree with that one.
I voted for #1 and #6 - I have no idea on the prices - been so long since I've purchased a Jefferson.
66+, fantastic specimen!
MS64, well struck example with chatter marks above the braid and front leg.
I gave it 64*, very nice looking but too many hits and weakly struck. I have a '38D that looks a lot like this one, albeit with a bit darker colors.
My Minnesota brain read it as "10,000 lakes" at first
Separate names with a comma.
