MS 65
The photos certainly weren't ideal to show the dmpl surfaces-they were better for trying to come up with a numerical grade.
The reveal: AU 58 DMPL ....the photos aren't optimal to show the deep mirrors but they are there. Standards might have been looser for dmpl back...
I'm pretty sure that is just a function of the light bouncing off the mirrored surfaces.
Au details cleaned
AU; maybe even a slider ...can't tell from the photo, but I'm potentially seeing evidence of a cleaning
Some nice additions!
I don't tend to look at VAMs so that is not the answer for what excited me.
I didn't really notice any obvious doubling. Maybe just the photo?
Please guess the grade. And guess why I'm extra excited by this coin. :D The first photo is from the seller and the next is my attempt to show...
I like the squirrel. Nice set!
The photos of yours are nice. NGC photos in general have been fairly solid from what I have observed others say lately.
Nice set! I'm glad to have been responsible for a few. :)
I don't see any explanations but your guesses seem to make the most sense.
Somehow I missed this thread the first time around but glad I saw it now. That's a cool way of doing a type set!
You are correct as there are GSA “soft packs” which contain circulated coins. see link from NGC below:...
Separate names with a comma.