GD opts out on this one. I don't want ya to develop a complex spock :D
We have the same impression ;)
It might on a good day, but I'd say more likely a 65. A little too much light chatter for a 66 IMO.
I believe so, yes. Those are not bag marks, that's damage. Again yes. The minimum XF grade - XF40 reverse - High points of breast, legs and...
Please see response in your other thread. And please, it is not necessary to post more than 1 thread asking the same question.
Somehow I don't think that one was though Mark.
Yes they are, so is ICG.
You're absolutely right it is. But I'll tell ya what, when that tarnish looks like this - :eat:
There are a great many dealers who couldn't recognize a problem coin if you hit them with it. Just because someone is a dealer, that does not mean...
Yes, I have owned several for many years. They are OK, but there are certainly better safes out there. For the first few years there are no...
If it says that, it is absolutely not a genuine coin.
Not at all. They are buying genuine US dollars from a bank and altering them.
Because they aren't in circulation. They are sitting in bowls and jars and boxes in private homes. They mint as many as the Federal Reserve ask...
Their response doesn't even address your question about the reverse proof let alone answer it. If you visit the site they linked - you can't even...
TC - Something that no one else has mentioned yet - do you feel confident in your ability to accurately grade the coins and identify problem...
Troodon that coin has definitely been harshly cleaned. I'm not knocking your coin, but if you think that it hasn't been harshly cleaned then you...
2012
I rather doubt the surfaces are painted to produce their so called reverse proof, but you can bet the surfaces are definitely altered.
I didn't say it wasn't important, just said you weren't paying for it. Your paying for their opinion and you get that even with a body-bagged coin.
Sticky 0 key :o
Separate names with a comma.
