Nice proof! It appears to have that bluish purple tone of a proof that has never been dipped. I like it.
It's ok. we have meds for that.
I'm very suspicious of this one. I don't like the dentils, there are metal blobs on Liberty's neck and clothing, and possibly some raised metal...
I think this one is probably genuine, although some of the reverse dentils on the left give me pause, but you will see sections of weak dentils at...
Another tough one. I don't think the dentils look right, the olive branch looks soft/blobby, some of Liberty's hair details don't look right to...
There are a few things that bother me... obv. dentils don't look right in several areas. Strange surface to the left of the date. There are some...
I vote probably genuine
I don't have a lot of these.... [IMG] I'll skip the rev it's kind of "meh"
I only have a few. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
That sounds like a good strategy. As a collector, if I saw those in your display I would be extremely interested. As a dealer, you must compare...
Beautiful coins! I expect they won't last long in the inventory...
machine/strike doubling,not a doubled die.
I am quite sure the seated dollars are fakes as well.
[IMG] [IMG] undoubtedly dug up, but not by me. found in Vermont, though!
now that the smoke has cleared, the dust settled, the crick running clear again... back to the o.p. I suggest you obtain a copy of Bowers'...
An R-2 variety graded xf details by ngc, holed, plugged and whizzed sold on Heritage last year for about 2600.
nice going, Kanga!
I like the '29 as it has a classic "circam" look to it. The other coin looks spotty to me but not unattractive. We have a Goochland Co., Va....
[IMG] [IMG]
as a matter of fact, I just received another 1861 in the mail: [IMG] [IMG] hope you like crust!
Separate names with a comma.
