I did, post 62. I suggested he let a professional look at it, this morning he messaged me that he had sent images to numismatists in the U S, and...
[ATTACH] I asked for a close up of the shield. Here is what I received.
[ATTACH] I guess the second paragraph here is public knowledge, it's in Scott Travers book.... Put the jar in a warm place, and you may get...
Wow that's a cool pile of coins.
I messaged the seller that I believed it was fake, he replied that it was genuine. I asked for a sharper picture of the shield, haven't heard...
64+
The Morgan looks XF+. With the scuffs, maybe 25-27$
+1 means "I agree" or "I second that". Some see matching holders as important, some are just interested in the coin inside. I have slabbed coins...
[ATTACH] I filled a Mercury album years ago, except for the 16D. Then pretty much just shelved it. Then a couple years ago an antique shop...
[ATTACH]
I'd say that's reason enough to buy them. ( You like them ) But relatively common, worn coins seem to always stick close to their silver value.
64 then, 65 today
Great coin, if it is a 70cc quarter. Try taking pictures out of the holder.
Right on, I was going to say the same thing.
A little better date coin. .. but doubling? I don't see it.
I find circulated Morgans to have a nice look. I once did a dansco date set, shooting for some of the better date/mm combos. I was thinking you...
Appears to be looking at something distasteful...
The rim just got bumped. This is an issue but the coin looks nice otherwise and the graders apparently felt the coin was worthy of a straight grade.
I'll go PF 64. It does look like a proof, though I have one that looks a lot like a proof but is not graded as such.
Separate names with a comma.
