Looks fake, date wrong, lettering and stars incorrect.
I think messydesk was saying multiply by .67 instead of .72, allows for a little wear on the coins.
20 or 25. I'll guess 25.
Good eye. After some looking I can see the triskele ( man autocorrect hates that word) alignes differently with the lettering.
Interesting question. The answer may depend on the series and era. As a Morgan collector, I have read that in the case of the 1900 O/CC, the...
Just picked this one up for the Overton variety. O-118, R.4, all date digits re-cut higher. [ATTACH]
I'm gonna stick my neck out and say I'm not sure it's genuine. I think I see some pimples on it and I've seen fakes that have a similar color and...
Looks like it sure could go 65, on my phone anyway...
I see you've asked this question twice, and I don't know the answer. Possibly different dealers offer different deals on combined shipping. At...
I could agree with 60 or 61. Pretty battered and probably overdipped.
I believe KM50 is right. I think 1661 TLB. I think it's interesting that Krause gives a total mintage of 7,000 for 5 years of this type (with TLB)...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Can someone help with this coin, maybe give me a KM number? It's about 16 mm.
QT to me.
What's the date on the 6th coin in the top row (with indian)? Dominican Republic, I think.
I just thought it looked like a 64. Many believe PCGS overgraded this hoard as a favor to a large submitter. Not all, but a lot do seem overgraded.
I buy occasionally, all transactions have been smooth. Like other online sales, I've had coins that looked original in the pics turn out to be...
OBH? 65 then.
I'm somewhere in the middle, I think. I definitely was the kid in the candy store when I started. Then as I read about the "right" way to...
High XF
64 then, 65 today
Separate names with a comma.
