Neat, didn't know that!
Attractive. I'll guess MS65. I probably know less about quarters than you do though.
Nice contrast. Pretty easy to attribute, pointed top 6, no stem through eagle's claw so... O-109.
10 year old thread. But thanks for bringing it out of the depths, it was an interesting bedtime read. :)
Missed this thread, but gorgeous toning on that Morgan
We are just being forthright and honest about your coin. The luster has been damaged. Just appreciate it as a somewhat attractive item passed down...
See the "halo" around the head, the letters, the stars? That's a giveaway that it was cleaned/polished.
64, if it wasn't overdipped. Surfaces look a bit off. Is it slabbed?
I agree with the comments above. Also, please be aware that not all flips are safe for longterm storage.
+1
Badly cleaned/polished Look at the obverse, it appears the luster is gone except for in the crevices of the stars and letters.
A quick dip likely would make it look better. Just don't overdo it.
AT surely.
64
I'll guess MS65
Have you ever, or have you heard of, a coin being damaged while removing it from a TPG slab? Comments welcome. I've always just used a hammer and...
Kinda pretty colors, but I think it should be MS63, no star.
Looks like a 63 to me.
Not a monster, but I'm OK with the star. I do like concentric toning.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
