Sure, looks like some interesting pieces there!
First thought - nice 65
I voted 66+, looks like I have some company
I've about given up on posting pictures because they often just don't look right. But Ok, I had a try with my new cell phone. Not happy. The color...
Informative post, @-jeffB . I hazily knew this, but good to see it spelled out!
Looks quite nice to me. My opinion, not having seen it in hand, is a bit of honest circulation.
Edit Really can't find decent pics, I'll try to get some!
[ATTACH]
I like Franklins. Looks to me like they stood up well to even moderate circulation, and like you mention, a lot of them didn't circulate for too...
90% - 1 40% - 1 1976 - 17
63. Been dipped, but acceptable to the TPG's.
90% 1 40% 2 B. 13
I generally think ANACS blue label holders are somewhat, and sometimes very, generously graded. They hurt their reputation with these.
I got outbid... badly..:(:joyful:.
Impulse buy, but I think it's kind of cool. Actually smaller than a Dime.[ATTACH]
Jumping in.... 1- 90% 2- 40% 11- Bicentenials
I'm late....but educational thread. My first thought was 45-50 range.
Nice! I love coins like this. A thrill to hold in your hand...
Back to the original question, playing the "crackout game". I have a number of Morgans in fatty holders that are nice for the grade, but none that...
Here's a few. Sorry I'm not much of a coin photographer. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.