I'm terrible at grading from photos, especially Morgans, so will just opine that both are very choice and great looking!
Happy anniversary!
I think I like the photo presentation more than the coin. Still, it appears genuine from the photos, cleaned, with some rim damage.
I sent seller a polite message explaining why it is fake: a full gram underweight; bad dentils, bad stars, ribbon tips too long, fat puffy date...
[IMG][IMG]
Wow Larry, just knock our socks off, why don'tcha!
I like 'em both, but especially the look of the 1829. On the 1830, is the 0 in the date as made, or is that some pmd?
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Nice job, that's an impressive group with a wide variety of designs. Study all of those and you'll probably qualify for a degree in Ancient History!
I agree it looks much more appealing in the full slab image.
I bought this example years ago raw (and cheap) to practice verdigris removal. This is pre treatment: I was able to remove nearly all the green...
maybe it's just the lighting, but one of the quarters looks like it has high point rub to me.
Well, in general GC photos are not flattering (a GOOD thing, imo) but you can bet that the high bidders have seen this coin in hand. Several...
Nice coin! You should post that on the Circcam thread.
I think Jaelus hit the nail on the head. My opinion, which anyone reading this may not share, is that I believe that numerical grading is a...
The thread is still up, but the author has been banned as a recurring alt.
I think the windowsill idea has merit. Just may try it.
Beautiful halves Eduard. I love it that you bought 2 of them raw! YOurs looks nice and original Vertigo. Hope it beans.
My guess is 62, based on the obv fields; but I may just be fooled by lighting. We'll see
It has a MUCH better strike most of the 21's I've seen. I always give raw coins an acetone soak to remove organics and pvc; preventive...
Separate names with a comma.
