Looks quite nice. 64+, not an option, guess I'll fall back to 64.
. Sorry, posting problems:(
[ATTACH] I know my pictures are not great, but this one is challenging me...so, thought I would let the CoinTalkers have at it.
[ATTACH] If you haven't read this book, it's an easy read that you might enjoy.
I too think 63 max
Yeah I figure it's better than spending money on wine, women, and song. It's good though, to exercise some self-discipline and structure so you...
Well, the OP Ok'd it... At best the coin has been played with, the surfaces are not original. This doesn't help authentication. Also an added...
First impression - I'm leaning towards fake
This one makes it. 6.0 Edit: 6.4
This reminded me to check, I haven't looked at my Where's George account in a long time. I do have 1 new hit, in Lubbock TX. I only have about 30...
Neat item to me. I see one graded NGC 55 sold on ebay for $300 obo. It can be hard to pin down a precise value on many coins.
[ATTACH]
In these earlier series, some collectors (the scholarly type?:)), are more interested in obtaining varieties than fretting about "problems".
3.0 I'd sure choose this one over a white one.
62, this date comes nice. It might just be the light catching the obverse scratch, but it looks to me like something the coin should be downgraded...
65+ Isn't this one of those dates that are graded a bit more rigorously?
O-103 R.5
Wild guess 64. Neat little coin, whatever the grade.
3.4, I dunno, lots of blues and purples just don’t do it for me.....again, I make no claims that my opinion on nickels should mean anything....
AU something, though I lean towards cleaned.
Separate names with a comma.
