Old thread, but why do some sources call the comet head (O106) an R2 variety, while others call it an R5? (Including my Overton book.) And no, I'm...
64
4.6 on the quarter, I like.
Thanks guys. @charley, I'm probably thick, but what is the old 5x school?
+1
So you feel like it could pass as circulation contact or a planchet issue? I guess that is really my question. My first thought was that someone...
$26900
It's on Ebay, 1822 bust half, PCGS AU58...I don't care if someone posts a link, I can't get it to work.
I reckon my title should have been, "Should this half have straight graded?" :)
Just noticed this 1822 half in a AU58 holder. Not interested in trashing a grading service or anything like that, but wondered what y'alls would...
Morgans usually sell for a bit over melt at a minimum. I agree that there seems to be signs of cleaning and the 21S is hugely common. I wouldn't...
Merry Christmas to all! May your day be filled with peace, hope, and joy!
64 star Probably a 63 but I think it likely got bumped.
5.6 on th 82S Morgan.
???
4.4 on the Canadian quarter.
65, good eye appeal.
I'll go with buffed. It sure looks worse in your pictures. I think I'd try to politely return it.
5.0 on the dime. 3.0 on the Morgan. I might almost call the obverse toning on this coin questionable, though I don't know why a coin doctor would...
I suppose the alloy is correct? Probably just the pictures, the fake looks like .999... I hate it that stuff like this is making the hobby more...
Separate names with a comma.
