63 seems about right, about all I know about these is they have a reputation of being difficult to grade.
March 8 vs. today, April 13 Bitcoin 63,590 Etherium 2,300 Dogecoin .095 I previously lightened up in crypto, unfortunately....
My mother (born in 1945) had a quart jar of silver coins and buffalo nickels she had pulled from circulation. As a kid she let me pour them out...
I see what you mean, but check this area out. I feel 105 matches better. [ATTACH] Also, star 13 points squarely at a segment on 106, your coin...
XF40, maybe 45. I agree with 40. And yes, been cleaned. Still, a little bit better date.
+1
You possibly just mis-typed, but I believe it's O-105. They share the reverse (E), but the points on the 1's (in the date) are small & blunt.
AU55
Looks like the luster is better in the protected areas, I'm thinking high AU. Maybe 58. Edit: guessing circulation strike..
Late, sorry...I found this comment in the Overton book, "The edges of 1833 dated half dollars usually show only slight traces of the vertical...
I believe vertical reeding between the words started in 1831 or 1832. I'll look it up tonight if no one else verifies.:)
62 here also
If they are common dates, probably not worth it unless they will grade MS65. Maybe not even then.
I was thinking low mint state, dipped at some point but some light toning now, nice coin for the grade
Needs more light to grade with confidence, but I'm thinking AU-ish.
AU50
63
Late, but I was thinking 67
Entry post. This would be a cool win. Thanks, @Eric the Red for your generosity!
First impression 64, sticking with that. Nice skin.
Separate names with a comma.
