Maybe a little, but I have a book that really helps- plus I use various other sites to help with attributions. Like heritage, tom deck and other...
I like your coin Weasel. And nice post on 1804's - I was never really interested in adding a restrike coin to my set when I collected them.
Nice pickup.
Nice additions.
Yes - 160 and 161 are almost the same both use same obverse. The difference is in the reverse. There are 3 differences (1) second lowest outside...
Congrats.
Sticking with 161 - now where is Marshall or Conder when you need them.
A glow in the dark weasel doing 200. :) Nice pickup.
It does some - compare it to Tom Decks S-161. If you have the book it might help. The one thing I am not sure about is the E in liberty to the...
I do not believe either coin that was posted is not S-248. The first coin posted looks like (but I am not positive) like a blunt 1. Which could...
Nice coin. Good luck with the re-grade.
I personally would go upper end of VF and maybe squeak out XF40 at like a TPG. I do believe the wear I see limits it to VF, but in hand could be...
Did you check the VAMS on the coins? Maybe a top-50 or something got snuck in.
LOL - Nice pickup.
Congrats weasel.
Good luck.
Good luck Weasel. And yeah some better lighting on the coin might help.
I gotta few but this is not all of them. My favorite is that 1837 with bisecting die crack and actually the lowest grade of all of them. [ATTACH]
On these you really need a book - especially on later dates. Lots of different combinations on obverses and reverses. These can be fun to build...
They still do that around here Pam. It's funny you mentioned that - my stepmom's son just mentioned it last week or two when he was driving...
Separate names with a comma.
