[ATTACH] An older canadian coin
I agree with 64
Like I promised...better pics of my 1913 S Saint Gaudens[ATTACH][ATTACH]
Sorry I have seen the coin was graded in 1986.....So please let me try again...64 Obv and 65 rev.
By today standards it would probably be a MS65, but in the early seventies they were more strict in grading those coins. So I guess MS 63 obverse...
A nice repunched date...but I'm suspicious with the color.....what do the experts think?
66 Plus, no FS
AU Details
A good choice would be a somewhat rarer date in MS62 with good eye appeal. My favourite saint is a 1920 or a 1910, both philies. There is no extra...
Quite frankly, between following the financial markets and job-searching, my free time is nil. Please gimme a grand and I will visit you in the...
Please do not sell all of these lovely pieces full of history. Build a set or two with the uncirculated ones. Especially in a Dansco album. Maybe...
Both MS65 with fbl
Au 55 to AU 58....there is little wear.
When TPG grade a coin, luster and mint bloom counts most. Luster is the important factor for eye appeal. Imo a bagmark or two more does not mean a...
I agree with MS 63 with a shot to MS64, if the cheek is not serious injured.
It depends on the coin, not on the slab:-):angelic:
MS 65, nice toning
64
That's a bit difficult. Weak strike or signs of wear obverse, especially the skirt line is weak. I guess MS63....
:jimlad::happy:
Separate names with a comma.