Got it from numiscent. He said that he had no idea why PCGS did call it red. I agree that it should be red. PCGS said 64RB. The 64 I agree...
The "scratch" is none of the above. I think it is a die break, but it is very faint and could be a strike through or planchet flaw.
Sort of. You need to read post #23 in this thread
65 RED? I think I have some nice Lincolns, but the last one Heritage sold went for $27,600. All I can do is dream about that coin!
They probably bless it little, but they are pretty close.
What is your opinion of this coin? Remember that this is a 20's mm and typically weak strike. The first pics are mine. For some reason the...
From what I can see, we are now both - or at least I get the same responce on either.
Me three. If you look closely, it happens when there are 14 (29, 44, etc.) posts in a thread. There are no posts on the last page, but somehow...
I am being a nit-picker, but that is 5000 - 5600 Calvin (abbreviated K).
Because they went with the coin. There was no internet to speak of.
Already mentioned that in post #11. First, there is only one PCGS 65 RD 26-S. The second is an NGC. Alos there are numerous one to a grade...
A war shortage of tin? The composition was 95% copper and 5% tin and zinc. For 1944 to 1946 it is listed as 95% copper and 5% zinc.
To quote the Red Book;
They are, but they aren't. The ones who most need them are the ones least likely to know that they can access them and vice versa.
Yes! I am well aware of it - especially since I am a free member
You mean like this one 1887-S (courtesy of Heritage)
I don't know the identifiers for proof, but that 09 looks suspiciously like a proof to me. Nice coins!
That is a nice clean coin. 66RB?
Conder101, Here is a quote from the NGC. I read that as saying it is only open to dealers and Collectors Society members. Are you seeing...
I do not see what is so dumb about the auction, but what are the bidders thinking? 58 bids mostly by 2 bidders and the last 5 were by the same...
Separate names with a comma.
