Just looks worn and beat up. Lots of things can happen to a coin that old.
Looks like it might be a little bit of damage, hard to say for sure. I think it just happens to look a little bit like an S.
No, I have the Whitman Encyclopedia of Colonial and Early American coins. I did recognize it as one of the 33 obverses though. Those and the...
I think it is 33.19-Z.2 but not positive. Check it out closely, I may have time to look later.
Not seeing any errors, picture is a bit blurry though.
No error, just damaged. Welcome to the forum though
They are fascinating coins. Because it was a clandestine operation, much of what is "known" about it is conjecture. The Whitman Encyclopedia of...
It is just some sort of environmental damage.
This is one of the cheap souvenir type replicas sold in tourist shops Civil War areas.
No, nothing in the minting process could make marks like that, just damaged.
Yes, that is damage.
What in particular do you see? I see a little damage but I may be missing something.
Be careful with youtube, there is more misinformation there than good information. The 1982 D cent you are looking for is the copper, weighing...
Looks like it might be smooshed a little bit, could also be a small die chip.
What specifically do you see that you feel may be an error?
No, not an error, it is just damaged.
Usually by weighing them, a copper cent weighs around 3.11 grams. That is not necessary on yours though, the beginning of zinc blisters are visible.
No, they are either large or small, not both. Both of your 1982 d coppers are large date, they really are easy to tell the two apart. In...
The coin on youtube is clearly just damaged as well.
Those are large date.
Separate names with a comma.
