Thanks, I appreciate the feedback.
Thanks for the feedback @Evan Saltis I have the same problems.
My entire collection is based upon eye appeal.
I am making photographic records of all my sets. I just started my ASE Bullions. They are difficult to photograph. Here are three that I would...
Too bad it was on the end where it got marked by the roller. Great find though.
Really? Here's a start. [ATTACH]
I agree.
Great idea, but I wouldn't know where to start.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I don't understand how a coin could be considered PL when there is so much detail missing. It almost looks like a weak strike. What is the standard?
Great coin. I have a couple of those 50th Anniversary Sets. All 4 coins are awesome.
Keep the good information flowing.
Decide what eye appeal suits you and your collection. Go for that. Never be concerned about status or competition such as mine is graded higher...
Look like punch outs from electrical boxes. Perhaps left over from a job in the area.
I still think the blank was damaged prior to the strike.
Thanks. I too do not watch much TV. When I do it is typically history and documentary stuff. I like to surf history and archeology articles on-line.
Sounds like fun @Bing but, I have a difficult time reading fiction. I had trouble in school because we were required to read so much fiction.
The blank was damaged prior to the strike.
Lamination prior to strike.
I suppose I should clarify. I agree that the Hudson's and some other low mintage didn't see much circulation. I did find several such as the BTW...
I have several different ones and found them in circulation back in the 50's. They did circulate because after the war if you had 50 cents you...
Separate names with a comma.
