Better pics please....
[ATTACH]
It's not an easy attribution, certain years are just known for high relief, early surfaces. These half dollars are being heavily scrutinized.
Notice that the doubling doesn't follow a pattern, It is also flat and shelf like. Pretty details and photos @amnight
Read that article yesterday. Pretty sad isn't it.
How can you say that the coin is not damaged? It has a rim ding to start and 4-5 dimple/dents in the reverse. The coin did not leave the mint...
I forget the die pairing for this one. It is a later die stage and an r-5 if I remember correctly.[ATTACH]
I am sure that if it weren't for the area 9 to 12 on the obv it would have strait graded.
I would guess VF details.
As far as finding coins with historical items struck into the reverse, I find those the most attractive as a buyer.
I have a 26' it just isn't being photogenic.
Fun coin Lee!
That is a cool coin. Problem is I need a new truck. LOL
I like you have a 25 next in line. I will flip you for it.
He @Petercoin can you get us some better photos of the coin. Clear shots of the damage on the reverse AMER area. Those scratches have the same...
I am sorry ya'll, this is the exact reason I don't buy unless the coin is in my hands at the time of purchase. That would piss me off. You are...
Huh, I had missed them. I still like 6.
I voted 6 because it has surfaces that do not look like they have been messed with. Hopefully the reverse matches. You will enjoy an original...
There are a couple of reasons that a Close AM can look like a Wide AM. Please take a few photos and start your own thread. You will get much...
@Justin L Alurid gave the best reasoning in my opinion. When a chunk of the die face breaks off, and a coin is struck the metal from the planchet...
Separate names with a comma.
