but others are quite possibly interested in it and posting a link to it and talking about it generates buzz and is likely to drive the price up.
http://numismatics.org/ocre/id/ric.5.tet_i.56
it's considered an auction fail to link to current auctions, as it often tends to drive prices up.
I mention it on my page I linked to earlier.
it's certainly not Julian II as Caesar since the bust would be bare-headed and this issue, with -S-, was struck for Julian as Caesar only.
This whole series, along with the SPES PVBLIC, was created for Constantine to sum up his victory over Licinius. The DAFNE type culminates this...
Sorry, I don't know.
someone did grade the coin-- note the AU I would price it around $45 in my store, but on eBay I would start at .99 and let the coin gods decide.
[ATTACH] :)
this is an upgrade (maybe) [ATTACH] but I will keep both since they are different workshops [ATTACH]
Lanz recently sold some of these on eBay [ATTACH]
I understand disappointment, but this is much ado about nothing. Unfortunately, mistakes happen and it seems that this coin was already sold. The...
google "procurator monetae"
They are both from Siscia. The first coin is •ASIS• Your second coin is ASIS, but if I am seeing a Chi-Rho on the reverse banner, which is not...
nvm
this one is a little rough, but the pediment on the reverse makes up for it. [ATTACH] Maxentius A.D. 307- 308 25x28mm 5.3gm IMP MAXENTIVS P...
RIC VIII Nicomedia 120 is a Julian II coin with bull reverse. The Sear reference is for a Constantinople coin. There is also no real reason to use...
Maybe we have different definitions of "dismal" but you can find plenty of these Emperors in great condition and the added bonus is that they can...
Theoretically, a smaller weight and size would/could make it RIC VII. If this issue was affected by the coin reform of 313, the pearl ring...
I don't think you can differentiate the RIC VI issue from the RIC VII issue, though RIC VII only has a legend break of CONS-ERVATORI, while RIC VI...
Separate names with a comma.
