Hey @Jeffjay my premonition came true. I posted about a week ago a 70S small date found in pocket change.
Luster is great but there is a bit of contact that I think prevents the 67. 66+FS
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Post #6 I was editing and got distracted.
I can't even find that , the N in ONE looks convincing. Make me think of a corroded coin sitting stacked on this one
Thats split plate doubling, it's a form of die deterioration. [ATTACH]
Hard to see it change. I would say that BU has he widest range of grades
They tore down the one in Arvada years ago, not even sure that there is one at 120th anymore.
VF on the Buff and nice details on the Princess!
That's to each his own! IMO
Sorry for the previous disruption. I like the Die chips on this Chuck E Cheese. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I have a couple of rolls of those. Nice CACG sample. This one is a mid die stage. It has brilliance but also has that satiny die stage. [ATTACH]...
I wouldn't call myself one either. The corrosion leads me to think PMD. Maybe a lamination.
Here is a jar of Lincolns that I have been filling for somewhere around 5-6 years. Nothing but MS AU58+ RD from ANA standards The majority is...
I get you, often some of the earlier chinese fakes and even contemporary fakes had close weights. what most of them lacked was the right weight...
Verdi care would work on something like that. I would soak it in distilled water for a couple of days before I tried something stronger.
I went 66 FS It looks a little crusty/original.
Do you have that in hand yet? or are these the sellers photos?
Some of it looks like a crack, then others look like corrosion. If you say it's a crack. Then!
I would look check it for the right rev. Then check the coin for other die markers. For example here is another crack from the Tiara to the field....
Separate names with a comma.
