I like how you put "MS" in quotation marks. Would they call this "cabinet friction"? Still, a pretty coin.
Well Di Nomos, I was in the same quandary as you with regard to copy stands - I didn't like the price or quality of what was available at a price...
I call this fake and voted such. It has the correct diagnostics for the C-4 (Obv. 3, Rev. C) and the die lump at "1"; blunt left foot at "T"; Die...
Quite nice. I'd say VF-35. Yes, it's a little dark but I think that just sets off the devices nicely. I've seen many lighter coins in the same...
OK, I'll play. This 1939 Walking Liberty Half in PCGS Proof 67 CAC is part of my complete collection of the seven proofs in this series...
Lovely coin. 58 all the way with lots of interesting things going on the reverse. As others said, better color and luster than most.
I wrestled with this one. Can't speak to its genuosity (should be a word). TPG grade AU-50 details. I think they would think it's been dipped...
My first coin for 2020 will be purchased at FUN. The last FUN show, I made my first purchase at the second table on the right immediately after...
I'm getting so many of these right or very close that I'm in danger of beginning to think I know what I'm doing! Gotta be careful about that with...
Looks like a fake. The mintmark is in the right position for the WB-1 and WB-2 marriages but the mintmark itself does not look like the "small,...
I voted 66 without a doubt and might go 67. I would like to have this one.
64 with a little hesitation as I think the TPGs might well call it 65. I just think it has few too many small nicks.
I'm calling it a 66 from the TPGs but my personal grade would be a high 65. It just has a few too many small nicks in prime focal areas and the...
65. I'd call it a 66 for luster, strike, cc, minimal bag marks...except the hits on the lower neck look pretty bad and distracting to my...
Separate names with a comma.
