And all of this ascertained from photog and not 'in hand'.....
Heck, '62 is danged ugly. Not to repeat what has already been said (but I will)........an nice '58 coups an low grade '60
Heck, why not just say it's a '63? :)
And I'm not gonna say no more 'cause I'll get in trouble with the Mods......
Heck, nobody 'round here ever seen graffiti?
You bet, old friend. :)
Heck, I don't think he would have hazarded a chance on these unless he trusted his own grading skills. Joe has 'crossed over'.........he used to...
Dunno.......lets see if we can get @paddyman98 to chime in.........
Well, you could probably strike me blind too, but that's just me.
He needs an Lincoln Lawyer........
Prime numbers? I'm back in school again.......aaargggggggggggggg
Mine neither, but always looking to learn. Every so often you have to stick your neck out to get your head chopped off...........:)
Just an humble opine.......the hair looks quite good, something that I based my observation upon. I see strands of hair.......something I...
I think you might be able to go mint state on this one. '63
Better than a boat.........that's just a hole in the water that you keep throwing money in.
I notice a little damage on the avatar, Kirk.........Verdidoug?
That '80 is an lovely, lively gal Kirk. :)
Lots of mint mark-less collectors are feeling rather crumby at the moment.......
Photogs can be deceiving at times. Perhaps if we had it in hand we could make an more agreeable assessment?
I should have known better........I got snookered on that one.
Separate names with a comma.
