Carefully executed..........most carefully, but you guys know that. It can be done with a minimum (to none) of damage. Just use your head....
Kripes you're devil old fellow.......
So you're the wild child? :)
Five years and many more, my dear Lady...........You are a contributer par excellence......:)
Harley? You sell vacuum cleaners? [ATTACH]
Bloody well right........:) [MEDIA]
Harsh grading fellow.........your advantage. :)
I collect a lot of mint junk, but I won't be buying this junk..........where does it bloody end? @cpm9ball once did a study of what it would cost...
[MEDIA]
Nice photogs dear fellow.......:)
Quality control at the mint is atrocious, but I don't think even the blindest of inspectors would have let a coin like this out of 'the house'....
Large date cent......... [ATTACH]
Still, a nice clean coin. :) Welcome to the forum dear fellow. :)
Not proof like.........at least ways by the photogs. I read somewhere that in order for a coin to be considered 'prooflike' it need to reflect...
Why not? No 'oops' I'm seeing.
I said '65 in the other thread and I stand my ground............not that means ahellofalot.......... [wonders if he gets infracted for that one]
#1 got a 'bump' for the toning. It's really a '65 in sheeps clothing..........
1:'66 2:'65
You got the hiccups?
New territory. You must forge on and 'find' old fellow. :) I know absolutely 'ditz', about camera phones.
Separate names with a comma.
