ISO at 1600? What the need to 'hike' it so? Nice piece. Lovely indeed........:)
But if the prints are 'latent' acetone ain't gonna do a dad blasted thing. Finger oils 'etch' the metal, thereby incurring an an ongoing...
It's conceivably an uncirculated coin dear fellow. Welcome to the forum.........:)
Go...........
[MEDIA]
Not sure about market value Rich, but appearance wise (at least with me) '58's trump (no pun intended) '61's..........:)
You mean Hannibal? Minus the the elephants........lecturn minus an 'N'? [ATTACH]
It's what I always do.........:)
what about my owl? Give it to Persius............
Scans are abysmal.......I didn't take that into account when I made my assessment. But, judging by the photog/scan, these old eyes detect 'wear'...
What? We didn't practice 'safe numismatics'?
Indeed. In my book '61 is of lesser quality and sometimes appears more 'baggy'. Give me a comely '58 all day.......
What did he grade it? Looks XF'ish to me.
Holy Mackerel, where ya been old sod? Ain't seen you in ages..........:)
Where'd ya find that OP? Under big foots' heel? [ATTACH]
Nice piece. Yours?
I agree with Cal.....the only reference I carry to 'the dance' is a well worn 2008 Red Book (spiraled) which I use mostly to check up on mintage...
Orient the blasted photogs correctly........
By the photogs? No way..........look at the breast feathers on the reverse. Were San Fran 21's poorly struck? If so I might change my opinion.
Glad as the devil you didn't get skunked dear fellow. :)
Separate names with a comma.
