HAHAHAHA...nice! Love the curve ball.
Still a nice coin, very original looking.
Clear pics, definately a WAM, AU-50.
HOLY @&#^$! That's one of the best snags I've EVER seen! NICE JOB.....and no, I didn't see it on ebay....or I'd be posting the pic of it. LOLOLOL
NICE!!!! Put one drop of VC on that area and work it a little with a toothpick. Looks like it will come right off to me. That coin is too nice...
Every single one of his coins has been altered.....disgusting IMO. He's an example of why I never came out with VERDI-TONE.
I can't blame them, I'm sure they've been scammed with all the buyer protections built-in now.
Die gouges IMO, not really an "error" and generally not collectible.
Extremely late die state.....the worst I've seen for the issue. While it's not really worth much, it's a very interesting coin, I'd keep it and...
Dang, at least we know it's a 1993 or later. It's still a GREAT coin!
AWESOME coin!
Yea....SWEET toner!
Whoa!
Thanks Dick!
Yes it would, a lot of the WAM die markers are known, especially for the 1999. If this were an error AND a 99 WAM we'd be talking serious money. :)
Did you check for a WAM reverse? Give us a picture of the reverse. Based on what I'm seeing, I'd guesstimate $50 or so.
PMD....no brainer.
Awesome error cent! Love the retained strike-thru!
69/70 are misaligned die strikes, a normal part of the minting process and not considered an error unless it's so far off that design elements are...
Really? You gonna open up that can of worms again? Why doesn't NCS change their name to Numismatic Cleaning Services then?
Separate names with a comma.
