That kilgore is a keeper!!!!
Thanks GD.
agreed GD. Thats why I stated it was a poor attempt at producing the desired "whizzing" result. Some folks have mastered that " counterfeiting "...
great example lehigh. thanks
Mark, check out the chin, on lehigh's example and the cap area as well.
This is also true Mark. Ksparrow said it best, I'm simply lazy and tired this evening. On close inspection you can see metal buildup along the...
True "whizzing" Mark, if done expertly is done by using a powered rotating brush, but you can tell when this attempt was made, even if done...
Kasparro, exactly. A wire brush was used. Hence poor attempt at whizzing. Secondly , the coin has been experimented with the process of "dipping",...
There's a couple of things going on with this coin. Poor attempt at "whizzing" is just one.
Agreed on images point.
Now the winning bidder must decide a few things. Do they send the pieces believed will upgrade, raw or in the original "Rattler" holder ? If I...
:rolling:ummmmm no pity for the winning bidder.:rolling:
Thanks a real looker. But seeing this 65 and focussing in on the leg of the 1917 for comparison, they don't seem to be far apart at all ( no pun...
Lehigh, can you do any better with the photos? looks sweet! from these pics that reverse almost looks mirror-like
Ok, after re-examining the photo of the 1917, it does appear to have a few more hits in the upper thigh area, and with the overall strike, I too...
I'll look at them both again.
I wasen't comparing the strike "differences" , rather than similarities. I agree the leg on this issue is a focal point. However your concern was...
Mark, does not the coin in the OP graded 65FH have similar chatter on the leg? I think thats a pretty harsh point for suggesting the 1917 is...
Once again, too many pictures of too many comparisons. It's no wonder people get confused. The last coin posted, 1917 is absolutely IMHO an...
absolutely gorgeous, and i'll 2nd " I think it's under graded.".
Separate names with a comma.
