NT on the EOR Morgan
What he said!
Exactly right, coincidentally, this is the same explanation for elevation chromatics where the recesses of the devices of a coin will have a...
That would support Jason's guess that the coin may be prooflike as an EDS coin. I have several modern Jefferson's with prooflike surfaces and...
Thanks for posting the image URLs, and we are all just "internet experts." I don't recall anyone saying you are always wrong, in fact, you are...
The devices and lettering of the coin provide a measure of protection to the areas that are adjacent to them. The toning on this coin was...
What is the grade on the 41-D? And is it also in ICG plastic?
I think the proof Franklin is NT/MA
The gouges at the top left of the obverse and on the rim should prevent a gem grade, MS64.
I'm leaning AT on this one, though the reverse and far left of the obverse look fine.
1983-D: I like my 83-D, it has great color. [img]
My initial impression was MS63, but based on the new photos that show much better luster, I would say MS64. I don't see any way for this coin to...
1982-D: [img]
I want you to contribute, but please limit it to coins that you think are AT.
Quintessential tab toning: NT I do have to ask, @BlackberryPie, do you realize the point of this thread is to post coins that you think are AT...
NT
I would like this in MS63, but I think it graded MS64.
Cameo coins from early proof sets are very rare, I’m not sure I would call them conditional rarities. I haven’t checked recently but I would...
Nice looking coin, I don't see anything that would lend me to say AT but with proof coins, you really need to see the coin in hand to render a...
Separate names with a comma.
