I think that coin is balanced on a knife-edge between 'acceptable' and 'enviro damage.' Personally, the obverse is too darkly colored for my...
Fortunately, the coin that I bought (and returned) was such an obvious fake (weight way off) that a photo of the coin on a scale would be...
I haven't logged in all week due to working late. Hats off to you, Dougmeister!!
My guess: PR 66 Cam (before I saw the other guesses, Looks like we sink or swim together!)
great piece of unintentional metal sculpture! Grade: MS-65 (Mangled State-65)
Looks real to me.
I think VF 20. Nice looking original coin.
I'd wait for a nicer one. if the images of the 71 are accurate it's a pretty dull "flat" coin; the 73 just looks too pockmarked for my taste...
Great looking Gobrecht Tom. And the '72 Novas were great little cars.
Looking forward to better pix. for now I hazard 40
I guess 64. Nice!
Glad to help!
DLRC has some good free references. go here: http://blog.davidlawrence.com/ Look in the right hand column for the book you need. Let us know...
AU 64
That Fox headline is the typical condensed idiocy we have grown used to from major news outlets these days.
That looks like active verdi to me, but why should pcgs care since their guarantee doesn't cover stuff like that.
Solves that mystery!
acetone and soap and water (fingers only) are generally considered acceptable and don't harm the surface of the coin. A lot of older silver (say...
Interesting. now the price has dropped to a mere $275. They are seriously trolling for suckers.
pcgs tends to fault darker coloring. I don't think there is enough luster to warrant au (given that I am working from images). Might get a...
Separate names with a comma.
