LOL.
[IMG]sold on Legend Jan 30
[ATTACH] [IMG]have a look at these 2 and examine the area in question. Similar?[ATTACH]
Ok, I'll just call it a line into the surface of the coin (forget incuse and depressed) and raised metal on either size which appears to me far in...
That's a strange looking scratch. I see a central depressed thin line, with a raised, thick border on either side. Scratches I have examined show...
I agree with insider about the 73-S above. Larger detailed images are needed. an edge view helps, too.
Love the color on that Merc, a real keeper!
I'm thinking XF45 at lowest, AU55 at highest, depending on remaining luster, which of course is tough to gauge from photos. The doubled date is...
the 73 S looks counterfeit to me: grainy looking surface, mushy rounded letters, just look at the 2 photos above of the lower reverse and compare...
Congrats, that's a really good looking large cent, good price.
Yes I did, but thanks for the suggestion. I just like them bigger. Old age, I guess.
Here is an 84 CC I have; don't own an 85. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I voted fake, although I would rather have a choice of"probably fake". I don't like the shape of the letters and mintmark on the rev, and the...
Thanks for the generous giveaway!
How about the Connecticut?
[IMG][IMG][IMG][IMG]Don't have anything for '93 or '94 (Yet!)
Hard to read the cheek due to toning, but I think I see some marks. My grade would be 64, but I will guess that it graded 66. I do like the look
..
NIce detail, looks like fresh dies.
SS66's 78S DDR looks genuine from the photos provided. Jack's 78cc can be immediately outed as fake by the type 1 rev. If all you had to go by...
Separate names with a comma.
