I'll guess 66, it has massive luster. The only mark I see that amounts to anything is on the eagle's breast (I think)
I'll post the assigned grade tomorrow night around 9 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Got Froot Loops? [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
45 sounds about right
The 1898 is a fake for sure, compare with any example in the Heritage archives. the 10$ looks fishy but I'll defer to ToughCOINS on that one
Nice, that's a challenging series, always in demand. I just have one, a 58
[IMG][IMG]
My take is that luster pretty much trumps most everything on washies at pcgs and this coin looks like a luster grenade. Also, obv over rev in...
I love that G6, beautiful tone.
Great find, and with nice toning on both sides.
Nice one!
That's one I'd like to see mounted rev facing front!
I was thinking, before I saw the reveal, that it was a 63, mainly due to marks in the obv field and muted luster.
GReat looking OC Bust, J.M. Mine's just a F12.
I'm not seeing evidence of altered surfaces on the excerpted image.
Thanks for getting back to us so quickly with photos. There is a fair amount of remaining luster, but the hairlines are apparent and whatever...
A whizzed Trade Dollar, ID'd by ICG. The coin is genuine, but the technique could be used to make a fake coin more "market acceptable." Thought...
100% cleaned.
expat beat me to it! I have one somewhere; it still has the clips to hold the attachments.
Separate names with a comma.
