here's one of mine lower grade to compare[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
It's fake. AU ish details but dentils absent on most of the rev. Liberty's figure is not very well excecuted.
I'd give about F15. I think it's probably genuine but couldn't be sure without larger pics. Generally, you don't see counterfeits of well worn...
Nice illustration Paddy54!
Reported. Egregious fraud.
That's a heck of a set you are building! All beauties!
I thought this was a very good quiz. Thanks, Insider.
I'm thinking around xf45 to au50; hard to tell on a coin with such a weak strike. I like the look, though.
my experience has been that the less wear on the coin, the less accurate are attempts to grade from photos. With that in mind, I think the IHC...
looks like it's gone.. nice work!
Thanks for the chance, Lord M.! If I win I would like the Clau..Clau..Claudius Roman coin.
I think it's post-mint damage.
The coin on the left has less distinct lettering. The surfaces look strange, dull. The edge reeding doesn't rise all the way to the top of the...
great example!
I will opine MS details, cleaned; the lines to me appear to stop short of the devices; especially the patches of them behind Liberty's head. Also...
very nice! I really want an attractive Sesqui.
63? some pretty big hits in the r obv field and on the sun disc. Neutral on the toning.
They tend to come nice with great luster as here. Heritage APRs look like around 3150 for non cac 66's. I dont think the OGH carries a lot of...
Those fakes are frighteningly well made. Thanks for the update, Jack.
now stored for over a year in a brown paper envelope. I think she's picked up a little more tone. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
