A lot of collectors like toned Morgans. Provided of course that the toning is attractive. If you would like some opinions of your coins, post a...
Under magnification, the lines appear "bumpy", and I think, a bit raised. It appears they may be more raised on the higher relief areas of the...
64
[ATTACH]
Didn't work for me but thanks, worth a try.
I can agree with your grade. But....possibly messed with at some point? Or at least hard usage.
I'd choose the top example, a coin with this much circulation needs some dirt and "circulation skin" on it. That being said, I've taken an...
I don't think this holder qualifies as "old", maybe someone can give the approximate grading date. The coin appears to have quite a few light...
1.9
I have a small bevy of raw ones. [ATTACH]
5.0 on each
I think there are lots of variables. But probably in general the "peace of mind" premium goes up as values go up. I'll throw out a thought of a...
After studying it I like it a bit more than my first impression. 3.6
Nice curve ball @ZoidMeister. I couldn't figure the obverse, but the reverse looked like a no question unc. Best not to give a coin the benefit of...
5.7 Edit: really I should have gone higher. Technically this one's a monster in my books...not the ultimate monster, but a monster. If that's...
I believe you can easily find a slabbed 65 of this date with more pizzazz than I'm seeing here.
As far as a grade, if the luster is there on the obverse like it shows on the reverse, I would think 63/64 range.
I agree, anything half decent is bringing $27+ on Ebay. I can't help with the vams, though as worn as these are I think it quite unlikely that...
Is the cheek scratch on the 2x2?
Strikes me her mouth looks strange.... Just a random comment, I never liked the 21's so I never look at them.
Separate names with a comma.
