Nice pickup.
Beauties both of them.
I am in the die cracks are cool category - not a mint error, but as Doug mentioned a flaw. On modern coinage - no offense to anyone - I can see...
Looks okay to me - crack it out and add it to the album.
Boy the pictures of the obverse just look wrong for the color. I waffled between 65 and 66 before going with 66. If it wasn't for the reverse I...
Dang - I missed a couple. Might be a good thing since I think I would have been one of the 64's.
Congrats
What a bad strike. I will swag Xf-40.
Your rich. But your coin is an N-6 in my opinion. Darn shame not an N-5. I think N-7 is a proof coin.
The forum is general discussion - it is still there you just have to opt in to see it. Or at least you used to have to opt in. Can say about...
Funny - so do I now. Each time I pull it up it looks more lusterous and 67 material. Oh well - looks like if it is a 67 a lot of us will be wrong. :)
Great find.
Common date cleaned or scratched coins I would avoid. Then again if you collect by variety you may not have a choice on some of them. I would...
I don't like the way the cheek looks. Maybe is the toning, but it looks like an awful baggy 64.
Nice write up. And I would love to make a large show like this one year. PS: One thing I have always learned is always, always, always call...
This is one of the few reasons I see to use a sniper program. With the few I bid on I would be happy to get them at my max bid. I use dealers...
The 1800 tops the cheerios dollar. Both are nice, but I just like the bust dollar better.
Nice 1819. I have a new 1819 on the way to me - another crack out for the album. [IMG]
See Dougs answer about temps. I doubt very many collectors would qualify as a PCGS grader. And I doubt they would put up with Doug. :)
Not a clue - you will have to wait for Marshall or conder.
Separate names with a comma.
