Yes, this is correct. For instance, on 1967 halves, there is a DDR that occurs on only on business strike coins. So, if you have a 1967 "SMS"...
Very nice. I would have probably said 65 based on the updated images.
"This listing was ended by the seller because the item is no longer available." Looks like the seller pulled it.
Watch out for the Loch Ness monster!
Are they from Great Collections? Their photos are probably not good enough to show a light cameo on the reverse.
Part of the point of being able to dump them in a counting machine is not having to sort them.
Even before that. The Romans made jewelry out of coins, too.
That's what I was originally going to post, but I didn't want to pile on the 64 bandwagon. It's probably a 64. :)
I'd say probably a bit more than that, but not much. Definitely not worth having certified.
Hint: How hard?
Somebody got bored and put it on a lathe. Maybe they were intending to make a two-headed nickel out of it or something. Worth 5 cents in trade,...
I'm good with cufflink. Pretty neat, especially if you have matched pairs with the same coins.
Nope, I did not and never have. It was just a lucky, completely random find.
How are they going to tell, if it's cleanly cut, with square corners, and the right size?
Sometimes the only way you can tell them apart is if the coin has a die variety particular to SMS or business strike coins. TPGs have a tendency...
I'm seeing repunching on the 6 and 9, and possibly the 8. Nice find. :)
It is true that some famous coins have had their certified grades increased over the years, but I don't think the reason is what you say it is....
Nice coin. :) Whatever you do, don't try to remove the "tarnish" or "clean up" the coin. You'll only end up making it completely unappealing to...
63+, just to be different.
Google. :) I was looking for a good picture of counting wheel damage.
Separate names with a comma.
