That is not quite correct. You can't have a numerical grade in the title or description, but you can have a picture that shows a numerical grade...
UNC details, questionable color. I don't like the obverse.
Coins in general rise with metals. High end coins rise more than generic coins.
I don't even know what to say about this. Unless the color comes from whatever the grader was smoking, I can't see how they say it's questionable...
Looks like it could be roll or album toning.
How do you figure? Coins tend to rise in concert with metals. Relatively speaking, silver has never done better than high end numismatic coins.
No, you'd have a solid copper coin, like a pre-1982 cent, but smaller, and with a reeded edge.
If there were no obverse or reverse clad layer, what you'd have is a solid copper coin, so there would be no "copper sandwich." Also, the weight...
I think what you have is a plain old dime that's suffered some environmental damage.
I'll say 65.
Everything up to 1964 is 90%. 1965-1970 are 40%.
I'd like to change my grades after seeing these pics to +46. :P
That depends on how many you expect would be 40% and how many 90%. If you were going to keep them, I'd just open the rolls and find out what's...
I can't tell from the pic, either, but I'd bet on yes. With the ultra low relief they use these days, it seems like a majority are full steps...
Very nice. :)
That seems like a rather odd set of denominations. What's that all about? I don't know anything about silver strikes. :)
I'm with the rest of the crowd. They look like Alibaba specials to me.
Yeah, there's nothing AU/MS about this coin. Somebody more knowledgeable than me will have to comment on the mint mark, but I don't like it either.
Good luck. Keep plugging away. :) I'd just make sure to search eBay in between shows, since you're looking for certified pieces. Also, here is...
Definitely looks like that "rolling fold," though I would never have come up with that on my own. I would say it's premium-worthy, as ASE errors...
Separate names with a comma.
