I wouldn't be. Most are circulated and will be fine for at least another hundred years.
What, no 93-S or 95? :P Just kidding, of course! Nice collection. :)
This isn't a Chinese coin. It isn't even the right design: [ATTACH] And, while I'm at it, AU52? Seriously? What the heck?
Sure looks like it does! Wow!!
LOL indeed. That's terrible. I'm surprised the current bid is above melt.
Interesting coin. Someone else asked but got no answer on this: are the diagonal marks on the portrait adjustment marks? I think so. Besides...
I have a double-sided rainbow toner with a crescent-shaped untoned area that I think has a better story. :) I would also prefer this coin to the...
It's nice and good eye appeal for a MS-62, but I don't think the toning is worth a premium, and that price definitely has a premium attached....
Highly questionable. But, more to the point, it's not attractive toning. Your money would be better spent elsewhere IMO.
Might guess later, but not just yet. I just wanted to say I love the 1880-S and the top 1884-O. :) 1887 is no slouch either.
Well, he doesn't seem to be misrepresenting what the coins are (though I can't tell if that 1968 S cent he's holding in his palm rather than by...
@Hommer: I think you missed this post:
If this photo represents what the coin looks like in hand, something is 100% wrong with it. The kind of cracked appearance above the eagle near...
I like this one a lot.
Normal dime with environmental damage. Notice how the edge still shows the 'copper sandwich' that a clad coin has.
@heavycam.monstervam I don't like the color on that coin either. Anybody have any comments on the Kennedy I posted?
Those look fine. I bet they'd grade if you sent them back in, if you're in a mood to send NGC more money. :/
The price looks like a fair retail price.
Is the pictured coin one of the ones that came back UNC details (can't tell if there's a mint mark there)? I don't see anything wrong with it.
I've only got one Morgan and one Walker. :P
Separate names with a comma.
