Thanks ya'll, I had Bought a few coins from him that day. With that grade it could have been a transition time. When they moved to their rescent...
Thats what I have been saying, and I got it in hand.
So, a clash would have the tranfered designs incuse, just like a vice job, if the devices are raised as you say. Then It would have to be double...
That is what is throwing me off. How does an 81D make it on an 69d cent? Someone playing with a press and used dies?
I agree looks good to me. I would expect to see more damage to the devices if it was a vice job. Have you done an overlay yet?
I thank you all for confirming what I thought. Any and all marks are very minor and has great eye appeal. I even asked the dealer, he said he...
I would say with the marks on his check and ear, a 63 but think it got bumped to 64 for the lustre.
I have a few raw MS Morgans but, my first slabbed.
I think @dwhiz posted one on another thread.
I am still learning my DSLR, Taking those kind of pics is my plan. Thanks
Those are both wide am cents. The A and M will be touching. I thought I had found one years ago, until I realized it was die deterioration doubling.
I didn't think it was the hits on the steps. But, more so, the depth and separation of the steps. On your Nickel it doesn't seem that there is...
So I bought this one because I didn't have an MS example yet! I have been wondering why it got the grade it did. I hope I can learn something from...
I will try to get some better pics, although the red seems real prominent on the high points, still in my opinion a 58. The high points (reds)...
It says Ct error
I am not seeing full separation under the 3rd column plus under the fourth they look a little mushy.
Yes, years of circulation, rubbed the high points of the S and turned it into a blobbed looking S. If you are looking for some resent mm styles...
Definitely, not Dull. It's full of lustre!
Thanks, I only paid Au money. The color on the reverse?
Ear
Separate names with a comma.
