45 years of circulation. It does not have the face of Roosevelt.
Definitely a chemical reaction to what you used to clean it with. Its still worth one cent.
I know you stated that in post two, I don't think that the area, on the horses belly can be attributed to the die chip.
I just caught this thread this morning, What year is the Morgan, for someone to go through all the trouble?
The area on the legs is a die chip, these happen frequently due to die wear.
Those are not the result of a clash, the area in question would be raised and not incuse for this to happen.
I thought this might help. http://coinauctionshelp.com/mintingprocesshistory.html#.WL2BiTsrLIU
It looks genuine to me.
That's what a late die state looks like. The die was at the end of its life.
I'd have to agree, with polish lines, the parallels are interesting though.
:rolleyes: Whats" green environmental damage"? That spot was perfectly noticeable when graded, Was it overlooked because of age?
I stopped reading! the only possible equation that I can come up with. Is some sort of split plating upon strike.
I found one of your sets in Littleton, CO. I almost swore it was yours, It has the certs and all, very nice looking, and well presented. I am...
I see that this could go any which way. My honest opinion Is that this coin is a 58. This Coin must be pretty impressive in hand, to get a 64. Jmo
The lower one because of the verdigris.
I am not sure what you should do. You can keep it as reference. @Insider might know a good route to take?
I would like to know more. How big are the sculpting's?
I see a bunch of polishing lines on your coin. None of the devices have a cameo of any sort. Better, cropped and over head pics are needed. How...
Welcome to CT!
This is what a no S variety looks like. http://m.pcgscoinfacts.com/Coin/Detail/5254
Separate names with a comma.
