That is gonna be just a tad pricey ;)
13 of them.
They look like cast fakes to me. May or may not have gold content.
Most of those that have actually made it into circulation are in the same place that all the billions and billions of cents are.
Hardly :rolleyes: And it is not necessary to bake the potato either, it will absorb the mercury quite nicely just by leaving it alone overnight....
Ahhhhhh - those coins ;)
I agree. Does not look like the real deal to me. And I see no rabbit ears either.
Understand your point, but I wouldn't compare it to the '33 double eagles. There were plenty of them minted, and minted legally. Now the '94-S...
I think it was on the reverse too, but the easiest places to see traces is on the obv. It's just tucked into the hidden places.
Another winner Clinker - keep up the good work :thumb:
67 - gorgeous coin !
I don't think either one would slab that coin. I think it had PVC on it and they didn't get it all off.
If the coin has no wear then I would agree with the 64 RB. But those pics - boy what a difference. Just proves what has been said many times, that...
Relief would be an issue. Striking coins with higher relief in today's harder metals would destroy dies at a very quick rate. Add to that the huge...
That's why I don't comment on errors often. Thanks for the correction.
I tried searching for it too Rusty, never could find it. Maybe asking spock would be an idea.
It is not the same, Intercept Shield is patented. But they (Dansco) claim it works the same way.
Did you read why you didn't get it ? Go to post #7 in this thread.
Boy I'm torn with the two sets of pics. Your pics make it appear that it has some light wear, the seller's pics make it appear that it does not....
&%$#@@*^&$ !! Now it works ;)
Separate names with a comma.
