It has a nice look in the slab. I could see a 66 if the fields looked as nice as they appear.
I had thought so but decided to ask. Thanks
I am not sure if this is a capped die, damage or a severely worn die? Any help from the experts?[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I am at MS65 no FS the planchet mark or ding connecting step 4 and 5 is too deep to get the designation.
I am at a 65
MS64 OMM-006[ATTACH] [ATTACH] MS63 OMM-003 D/D/S [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The nickel is damaged, with a possible heavy die polishing. It's still worth a nickel.
This is considered a Variety, not an Error.
This is not about what level I grade at, it is simply the fact that Market Grading has zero boundaries. Bottom line a coin should have the same...
Nice RPM.
Not exactly true.[ATTACH] I do agree that it is a variety. And not an error.
I have read this same argument from you in many threads. It is the same old thing. I don't trust their grades, I check them the same as I would...
Same answer different day! You have any new material? Or another statement about how PCGS is your BFF?
:happy:
All of the above is quite useless unless you believe in one of the TPG's. And if you swear by them? Then you will understand where @baseball21 is...
Heavily polished, this coin isn't worth the effort. Maybe for a belt buckle, or cufflinks.
You are sure welcome to ignore him, does that mean that I or other members will?
Computer analysis could never determine the technical grade there are to many variables IMO. What has happened is that technical grades are not...
Au details
See the heavy metal flow lines around the Buffalo? That is from die deterioration. The FIVE CENTS is doubling but it is die deterioration...
Separate names with a comma.
